Skip to content

Calitown

News, Here, Everytime!

  • Home
  • News
    • Cross River News
  • Features
  • Community
  • Inspirational
  • Toggle search form
  • “There Must Be A Takeover In 2027” – Imoke Sounds Political ‘War’ Cry! Cross River News
  • “This Is Our Only Response” – C’River State Govt Tells Akwa Ibom State Govt! News
  • Cross River’s 76 Oil Wells & The “Abiku” Paradox Features
  • Nentawe Goshwe Yilwatda’s Appointment As APC Chairman: A Triumph Of Meritocracy & A Boost For Democratic Strengthening In Nigeria Features
  • Obubra/Etung Fed Constituency: How Long Will You Mourn Over Saul? Features
  • Peter Obi Says Nigeria’s Failed Leadership Failed Unical Dentistry Students Cross River News
  • Unicross Holds Historic Senate Meeting, Announce New DVCs Cross River News
  • C’River Takes Delivery Of Two New Aircraft Cross River News

ONNOGHEN: Odili Disagrees As S-Court Strikes Out Cross River’s Suit

Posted on May 17, 2019 By Admin No Comments on ONNOGHEN: Odili Disagrees As S-Court Strikes Out Cross River’s Suit

Justice Mary Odili, today Friday, disagreed with six other Justices of the Supreme Court that a suit Cross River State filed to challenge the removal of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen, deserved to be struck out.

In a dissenting judgment, Justice Odili, held that contrary to the majority view of other members of a seven-man panel of Justices of the apex court, Cross River State, being where Onnoghen hails from, possessed the locus standi to raise legal questions regarding the suspension and eventual sack of their son as the CJN

She maintained that since the state raised constitutional questions through its Attorney General, the Supreme Court was an appropriate forum for them to seek answers.
Justice Odili held that the ex-parte order President Muhammadu Buhari relied upon to suspend the former CJN on January 25, was wrongly issued by the Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, in Abuja. She held too that the CCT, ab-initio, lacked the requisite jurisdiction to entertain the six-count charge that led to Onnoghen’s conviction.

According to Justice Odili, the entire proceedings before the CCT was invalid considering that the Federal Government, failed to channel allegations it levelled against the ex-CJN to the National Judicial Council, NJC, before it dragged him to court.
Going by extant judicial precedents, a serving judicial officer could only be tried after the NJC had exercised its disciplinary function, Odili further held.

Meanwhile, earlier in their majority decision, six other Justices of the Supreme Court led by Justice Olabode Rhodes-Vivour, struck out the suit on the premise that Cross River State Government lacked the locus standi to institute the suit on behalf of Onnoghen.

Justice Olulayode Ariwoola who prepared the lead majority judgment, further held that the Supreme Court was not the appropriate forum for the state to ventilate whatever grievances it had with regards to Onnoghen’s removal. Consequently, Justice Ariwoola struck out the case by upholding a preliminary objection the Attorney-General of the Federation filed to challenge the competence of the suit.

He, therefore, struck out the case without considering its merit on grounds that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain same. Though Justice Ariwoola was absent on Friday, his judgment was read by Justice Paul Galinje, who was a member of the panel. Other members of the panel that agreed that the suit deserved to be thrown-out were Justices Dattijo Muhammad, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Inyang Okoro and Sidi Bage (now retired).

It will be recalled that Cross River State had shortly after Onnoghen was suspended, approached the Supreme Court to challenge President Buhari’s powers to take such action without recourse to the NJC. The State invoked section 22 of the Supreme Court Act, which conferred the apex court with original jurisdiction to sit as a court of first instance, on disputes between any State of the Federation and the Federal Government.

Specifically, Cross River State, through the office of its AG, prayed the court to determine whether the suspension or removal of Onnoghen from office by President Buhari, based on an ex-parte order by a lay magistrate (the Chairman of the CCT), was not in gross violation of section 292(1) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. Cited as defendants in the suit were the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Attorney General of the Federation.

In opposition to the suit, FG, through the office of the AGF, argued the Plaintiff lacked the right in the suit. The AGF contended that Onnoghen’s suspension was personal to him and therefore could not be interpreted to amount to a dispute between FG and State Government that would require the invocation of section 22 of the Supreme Court Act. It will be recalled that the CCT had in a judgment on April 18, found Onnoghen guilty on all the six-count charge the FG preferred against him.

Culled from www.vanguardngr.com

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email Share on WhatsApp Share on Telegram
Cross River News, News

Post navigation

Previous Post: B R E A K I N G: Appeal Court In Calabar Affirms Death By Hanging Sentence On Former NNPC Staff
Next Post: “Chaliebaz Censored Madness Will Be 100% Fun” – Comedian Chalebaz

Related Posts

  • C’River Central & North Senators Stun Constituents With PTDF Scholarships Cross River News
  • CONFIRMED: Ayade Set To Appoint PDP Senatorial Aspirant As Commissioner Cross River News
  • RAPE: Calabar Pastor Remanded In Prison Cross River News
  • CR Senator Facilitate Grants, Distributes Essential Business Items To Constituents Cross River News
  • Sports Minister Celebrates Nigeria’s U-17 Women’s Team Stellar Performance At FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup Cross River News
  • 229 Unical Graduands Of Nursing Science  Inducted Cross River News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Comments

  • Tony Nyong on On The 77 Oil Wells & The Supreme Court Judgement: CRS Still Has Subsisting Legal & Potential Arguable Claim To Justify The Ownership Of The Wells
  • Elemi Alaga on On The 77 Oil Wells & The Supreme Court Judgement: CRS Still Has Subsisting Legal & Potential Arguable Claim To Justify The Ownership Of The Wells
  • Kelvin hart on UNICAL: Shock As 300 Dental Students Discover Dept Had No Accreditation 
  • Anonymous on UNICAL: Shock As 300 Dental Students Discover Dept Had No Accreditation 

ADVERT: Click to Watch!

https://calitown.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/VID-20170928-WA0003.mp4
  • “We Will Ensure That The Promises Made By The APC Are Kept” …CR PDP Chair Cross River News
  • Eat Fish…This Is Why! News
  • Otu Reinstates Monarch Dethroned By Ayade Cross River News
  • Speaker, CRSHA Flags Off Free Medicare In Abi LGA Cross River News
  • REVEALED: U.J.Esuene Stadium Generators Have Not Been Serviced In Nine Months Cross River News
  • Police Corporal, 32 Others Paraded For Robbery In Calabar Cross River News
  • Fire Guts Ugep Monarch’s House, Injures Children Community
  • EDITORIAL: His Excellency Got It Wrong News

CALITOWN
...News, Here, Everytime

Quick Menu

  • Home
  • News
    • Cross River News
  • Features
  • Community
  • Inspirational

Copyright © 2021 calitown
172 Greenwood Avenue , Hull. East Yorkshire. HU6 9NY

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme